April 15, 2020
This posting is taking a slightly different approach than the prior one. The next posting will go back to something more like the first’s format.
A Bit of Comic Relief
On March 30th, while the world was absorbed in COVID 19 a captain in the Venezuelan navy demonstrated that others have far more basic issues. His navy patrol boat, the Naiguata, intercepted a German cruise ship, the RCGS Resolute, in international waters off the coast of Venezuela. The cruise ship was told to follow the Navy vessel to harbor. The cruise ship captain refused; at which time some sailors began firing AK47s at the cruise ship. No one was injured, in part because there were no passengers on board. Then it gets crazy. The Navy vessel proceeded to ram the cruise ship, perhaps to force it towards the harbor. However, the Venezuelan vessel was no match for the double hulled cruise ship. Soon thereafter, the Navy vessel took on water, and eventually sank. Not surprisingly, the story is explained very differently depending on whose account you hear.
I Heard It On The Grapevine
The hashtag world doesn’t seem to need a “grapevine” anymore. However, it the old days (when I was growing up) the grapevine was a highly reliable source of news which hadn’t broken. Mostly about things happening in the community, not world events. You talk about “he said, that she said, that he said…..”
Monday morning I braced the cold winds and decided to walk around Lake Merritt. This is a gem of Oakland, not far from downtown. Easy to get to from anywhere in Oakland. Lots of people exercise here any various times of the day (including crews who row there), Forget about finding a place for a family picnic on a sunny Sunday afternoon. (Group gatherings in parks are forbitten these days.) In the course of a long walk (the lake is about 3 miles around) I saw the following messages, usually spray painted somewhere inappropriate. Signs of the times?
Capitalism is the virus
Despite my opinion we would do better with a much weaker central government, I concede we do need federal government to do some things. One of which is, on a limited basis, make sure capitalism doesn’t go amuck. I am troubled by income inequality in our society. I believe the answer to this pressing issue is to get closer to “equal access for all”. Note, that is different than the opinion we need “equal outcomes”, as some propose. Effort, intelligence, focus, and some luck should determine who “wins”. A very good place to start this transition is to vastly improve the schools attended by poor people.
Many members of society are not stakeholders in our robust, largely “free market”. They live in great uncertainty, have no capital reserves, are often in poor health because they can’t afford to see a doctor, and so on. Equally troubling to me is the sense that many Millenials (roughly those in their twenties to late thirties) have seen the downside of capitalism (2008 crash), and actually prefer a more socialist society. (I wish I could talk one on one with someone who fits that bill!)
I don’t believe capitalism is a virus. I assume the author thinks socialism is the cure. It is incredible to me the author can’t see that hundreds of millions who have gained a comfortable life in our free market. Further, I wish the author had considered the fact that many previously highly socialistic countries have chosen to reduce socialism in society. A good measure of the level of government spending as a percentage of GDP. Fareed Zakaria documented this recently on his Sunday morning GPS broadcast. In other words, what Bernie Sanders is pushing (a very large federal government with dramatically more spending than current) , isn’t really what those countries are doing today. Many have reduced the spending of the government in the economy.
Nationalize Amazon
This is actually quite interesting. The author may not be aware Amazon lost money for its first 12 years of operations, about half its corporate life. In addition, he/she may not know the company started by selling about 20 product lines, mostly books. How things change! Thanks to enormous growth they now are among the biggest businesses in the world. Last year they had $280bb of sales. They revolutionized many businesses, starting with the way we buy and read books. It boils down to one thing: Amazon’s founder, Jeff Bezos, understood something early on that others missed. When internet sales really started growing, the goal was to maximize “shelf space”, not generating a profit. Because of their commitment to grow the company by re-investing in the future, today you can buy just about anything at Amazon today. They dominate that sector.
It may be the author thinks Amazon is so large, it should be a regulated utility. No one can argue they aren’t large. In 2019 they delivered over 3bb packages world-wide. It had somewhere between 500-800,000 employees in 2019. (Different sources provide different results. This may stem from one counts only FTE’s while others count all employees.) However, usually bigness is not a sufficient condition to break up a successful company. (Look at the failed effort of the government to break up IBM, and the equally failed outcome of breaking up the phone company AT&T into RBOCs.) Bottom line, our markets have a way of self-correction. Does anyone worry about IBM’s dominance today?
However, the size argument doesn’t work for me. In almost all cases, Amazon has competition. In addition, while its user base is huge, there are lots of people who never use it. Also, more than half their sales come from third party sellers who are just using Amazon as a sales portal. Finally, one need only consider the operation of another operation which seems like Amazon. The US Post Office has five times as many delivery personnel but delivers 50 times as many items. (I get it the post office delivers everywhere, and Amazon delivers where demand is located.) In 2019 Amazon made $11bb, while the USPS lost $8bb. I wonder how satisfied the author is concerning Post Office “service”?
Gavin Has Rent Money
This one baffled me. Gavin is an unusual name, so it is a good guess this reference is to our governor. I admit it, I am not a big fan of his. However, I commend his early and clear interdiction concerning COVID 19. I also like the professional way he has managed this tricky situation. His daily briefings are important, and well done. I think our state is much better off because of his early decisions.
But was the intent to have people in need call his office for rent assistance? Clearly, deals are being made in this difficult area.
I understand California is a very expensive place to live, particularly in the bay area and Los Angeles. I did a quick search for some of the least expensive cities in the USA. There were 40 medium to large sized cities where a 2 bedroom apartment (about 750 sq. ft.) would be under $1,000 per month. In Oakland, only 4% of the market was under $1,000, while 82% were above $2,000. It looks like an average for Oakland is close to $3,000 monthly, with plenty of units well above that. It has been painful to watch as the market has gone through the roof, as the supply of rental units has not kept pace with the demand. This is particularly true for the lower end of the market.
I wonder if the writer realizes the very strong legislation which has been passed on a state and local level which greatly protects renters, and is generally adverse to the best interest of building owners. Contrary to popular impressions all landlords and not big corporations or “fat cats”. One of Oakland’s city council meetings I watched was devoted to protecting renters. A couple who were landlords stood up. They explained they had recently retired as school-teachers and had invested in a two unit apartment for their retirement. Their idealism probably will probably end up hurting them. Sad.
In addition, we have watched big east coast cities grapple with the steady pricing out of the market of long time, lower income residents. In the end, rent controls really don’t solve the problem.
Because of the expense, the state has developed many, many programs to help those who are having trouble “getting by”. Residents can get free phones, food stamps, free lunch programs for kids in school, subsidized energy, and the like. I am not against this.
Bottom line, there is a demonstrated need for some to get help to cover the basics. What doesn’t make sense to me is the focus of this note. I bet the grapevine is a very reliable source of information of what might be available.